Hurricane Katrina and the Decline of Western CivilizationI can’t lie and pretend that I this disaster couldn’t have happened to a more deserving city. It’s no secret I hate New Orleans, in the same way I hate Amsterdam-it’s a testament to what happens when hippies combine with a welfare state in an “anything goes” environment. Great art, great shops, dirty, perverted populace—in short, wasted potential. But at the same time, my best friend from high school (Bonnie) went to school there, and newly married Monica has huge amounts of family there, so it isn’t as if I wished for the sea to reclaim the city. Normally, I would just turn a blind eye to the emotionalism and the irrational hysteria concerning the destruction of my least-favorite city, but after almost 2 weeks, we’re still in a fever, and things need to be said.
The GovernmentYou knew as soon as this hurricane hit that all of the hatred over the Supreme Court nominees and the war would be focused directly on Bush, and that everyone would be looking for an excuse to start spitting some venom. And sure, there were things to be angry about. Three days after the hurricane hit he was still finishing up his vacation. Not really so cool. He was slow in federal response. Ok. These are obnoxious things, but not things that are ‘disgraceful’ or ‘horrific.
You want to know why? Because disaster relief, as my friend Amy Barr very eloquently summed up here (
http://sia.lostchicken.com/~aibarr/80365.html) is not in fact the plight of the federal government vis a vis planning and protecting. The federal government is supposed to respond with financial aid, not deploying troops and medics. One of the reasons why Toqueville was so enamored with the American system of democracy was the concept of township and states rights—through local independent government, cities could better identify their own needs and provide to them. Botching up your own system of planning, then, is part of the responsibility that comes with RUNNING A STATE. If a governor can’t manage her own state’s affairs, she needs to own up to it and not blame the federal government for refusing to hold her hand.
And in point of fact, President Bush did telephone the governor of Louisiana telling her to evacuate the morning before the storm hit, even though it was outside of his jurisdiction. And the Governor blew him off, instead checking with the weather channel and three separate organizations before finally, in late afternoon, agreeing to evacuate the gulf coast area. There is no excuse then, for the local government to have full hospitals during the time of impact. All those people should have been taken to hospitals upstate.
There are other things, of course, that the government messed up on—poor crowd control, not communicating the state of the problem to the crowds, leading to widespread rumor and panic (
http://www.reason.com/links/links090605.shtml). But again, these are failures that do not reflect on our federal government. So I’m not saying there shouldn’t be anger, but it at least direct it in the right place. Yeah, Bush is an easy target, but if we aren’t responsible in our critique of him, we come across as screaming children.
The Welfare State
I am guessing, and call me crazy, is that part of the reason that New Orleans is in such peril is because there’s a lot of water around. People are now in a swamp right. Well, that makes sense—NO is below sea level. Well then, if you have a city under sea level, you would try and really ensure that your levees hold, huh? But they didn’t. Why? Because they were EARTHEN. That’s right, in a city below sea level, we had earthen levees with concrete to protect the top from eroding. Why couldn’t New Orleans afford to build a steel dam benefiting a twenty-first century city? It didn’t have the money.
The city has been crippled by taking care of a burgeoning population of drug addicts and impoverished, state-dependent families. America has developed a bastardized, irrational form of welfare that creates dependence and strains local resources (just like Europe), but unlike Europe, everyone seems to be below the poverty line. We feel, as a Christian-tradition nation, that we should help the poor, but we are also a capitalist country, and believe that people need to help themselves. The result is so much red tape and unnecessary handouts that the only people who can understand it are those who study it—the welfare frauders, in itself a full time job. This creates an impoverished, poor group of people who feel both deprived and entitled, who have a permanent dependence on the government. And since only about 30% of these welfare families have both parents, the state raises children, buys groceries, but doesn’t actually teach anyone to get a job, get an education, get out. The money that should go to steel dams, good roads, urban development, instead goes to supporting a huge welfare state. I mean, the reason roads are a mess in the ghetto isn’t because of racism—it reflects what that neighborhood pays in taxes.
Suffice to say, once the hurricane hit, all of a sudden we’re barraged with photos of people waiting to be helped. Look at the latest Newsweek—there’s a family on a roof, some missing teeth, lying on a mat, listening to a radio, and under them is spray painted (water rising help pleas) and no, that is not a typo. Every member of that family is over 12, they all have limbs, why not use your resources and try and help yourselves? In general, most of the people that have been complaining the loudest about the governments “not taking care of them” are able-bodied people without injury who seem to have forgotten how to take care of themselves in crisis. Or at all. Don’t forget that this wasn’t a surprise. People knew that the hurricane was coming, the government provided buses for those that didn’t have cars, and NO ONE took them. You can’t help people who can’t help themselves.
The Race IssueHand in hand with the critique of the welfare state comes my criticism of the way the media is dealing with race. I’ll agree with Jason Mulgrew, that there is a level of hell reserved for those who exploit personal tragedy for their own agenda—hence, my disdain for media and minority leaders calling ‘racism’ every chance they get.
Whether these people want to admit it or not, there isn’t really a black-v-white war anymore. I’m not saying there isn’t tension, but it isn’t the full scale war they need it to be for donations, ratings, or power. In our country, the battle is between the rich and the poor. There isn’t much difference between a rich black family and a rich white family, but there’s a world of difference between a rich black family and a poor black family.
Now, in our society, especially in the south, the poor consist of predominantly blacks and Hispanics. I for one would not blame this on (modern day) racism, but on a variety of traditions and institutions, including minority organizations. (You think Jesse Jackson wants black people to get out of poverty? Where would he get his money?) Either way, minorities are the majority of welfare recipients. Whenever you have a class of people who are both impoverished and yet entitled or dependent, what, you think they aren’t going to go out and steal if they know they can get away with it? They’re used to getting things for free! Why not? It isn’t a black thing, it’s not a white thing—people who are raised to think that they deserve free stuff will be a lot more caviler about ownership than people who earn stuff.
The Media IssueThe
Dallas Morning News had a headline the other day—2 white twentysomethings were carrying bags of food, and under the photo, there was the headline, “White people don’t loot?”
Imagine, if you will, we did the same headline with Asians, or with women, or with jews. It’s ridiculous. But we put up with it. Why? Why do we allow the media to divide us into race conflicts so they can sell more papers? And we buy into it. Kanye West on MTV swaying george bush doesn’t care about black people. Sensational reporting of child rape and helicopter shoot outs (and then not retracting such statements). And then reporting the political finger pointing and emotionalism as if it were honest political discourse! The whole thing is an embarrassment. I hate it. I hate all of it. Ever since the story came out, there has been nothing but shrill emotionalism. I had to go to underground and European sources to get the facts, stats on welfare and why the levees broke, honest follow-up reporting to rumors, the plain facts of who-was-supposed-to-do-what.
And I HATE being one of those people who blames ‘the media’, because we are responsible individuals who have an off switch on the remote. But with both sides claiming liberal and conservative bias but no one reporting facts, I’m left to wonder if William Randolph Hearst hasn’t finally triumphed overall
My final verdict? Justice is a greater value than empathy or diversity. Sorry your houses blew down, sorry you didn’t get on the buses, sorry you expected someone else to take care of you. Sorry your government couldn’t build you a proper levee, sorry your government is capitalizing on your loss by making it political. Unlike the tsunami victims, you knew.
And you know what? I don’t feel guilty about not caring.